Publication

Minimum wages and worker retention

View document

Bibliographic Details
Summary:How are incumbent workers impacted by minimum wage increases? Is labour market concentration an important moderating factor? We address these questions by presenting a new model, drawing on comprehensive employer-employee matched panel data from Portugal, and considering individual mandated wage rises from both national and collectively bargained minimum wages. We find that employment protection plays a key role in these effects: workers under permanent contracts are almost completely insulated from the exit hazards associated with ‘wage bites’ while workers in temporary (fixed-term) contracts are exposed to these hazards. Labour concentration can significantly reduce negative effects on temporary workers, by up to 60%. A model of monopsonistic competition with firing costs rationalises these patterns.
Main Authors:Snell, Andy
Other Authors:Almeida, Enzo; Martins, Pedro Silva; Thomas, Jonathan P.
Subject:minimum wages Collective bargaining Temporary contracts Labour market power SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
Year:2026
Country:Portugal
Document type:working paper
Access type:open access
Associated institution:Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Language:English
Origin:Repositório Institucional da UNL
Description
Summary:How are incumbent workers impacted by minimum wage increases? Is labour market concentration an important moderating factor? We address these questions by presenting a new model, drawing on comprehensive employer-employee matched panel data from Portugal, and considering individual mandated wage rises from both national and collectively bargained minimum wages. We find that employment protection plays a key role in these effects: workers under permanent contracts are almost completely insulated from the exit hazards associated with ‘wage bites’ while workers in temporary (fixed-term) contracts are exposed to these hazards. Labour concentration can significantly reduce negative effects on temporary workers, by up to 60%. A model of monopsonistic competition with firing costs rationalises these patterns.

Funded activities

No funded projects found.