Publicação
ANÁLISE DA FREQUÊNCIA DE INFECÇÃO DE FERIDA OPERATÓRIA DE ACORDO COM O TIPO DE ASSEPSIA E ANTISSEPSIA NO PRÉ-OPERATÓRIO
| Resumo: | Studies suggest that there is no need to use brushes for preoperative antisepsis of hands, only recommending the use of antiseptics. The brushing injury appears to increase the bacteria on the hands and spread, while the use of antiseptic antiseptic reduces the time and the use of brushes. Objective: The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis between brushing traditional pre-surgical hand antisepsis with antiseptic and pre-surgically with handwashing using the antiseptic povidone-iodine (PVP-I) or chlorhexidine. Methods: To achieve these goals, a documentary and exploratory study of 200 gynecological surgeries and mastology performed in the University Hospital Alvaro Alvim, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ. The data of interest for the study were obtained from the data collection record surgeries surgical center and its records according to established clinical record for the collection of information. The 200 surgeries were divided into two groups being 100 children conducted by teams that used the scrubbing hands (group A) and another 100 surgeries the team just washed his hands with antiseptic (group B) mentioned above. Results: Four cases of postoperative wound infection were observed, two in group A and two in group B. The analysis of the results of the present study shows that the two applied pre-surgical asepsis methods, with and without the use of brushes, presented similar efficiency and effectiveness, since there was no statistically significant difference between the rates of infection of the surgical wound. |
|---|---|
| Autores principais: | Manhães, Raiza Tinoco |
| Outros Autores: | Mandarim, Maria Elena; Rodrigues, Andreia; Almeida, Giovanna; Caldas, Maria Alice |
| Assunto: | Lavagem das mãos, infecção da ferida operatória, cirurgia. Handwashing, wound infection, surgery. |
| Ano: | 2019 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Tipo de acesso: | unknown |
| Instituição associada: | IBICT |
| Idioma: | português |
| Origem: | Oasisbr |
| Resumo: | Studies suggest that there is no need to use brushes for preoperative antisepsis of hands, only recommending the use of antiseptics. The brushing injury appears to increase the bacteria on the hands and spread, while the use of antiseptic antiseptic reduces the time and the use of brushes. Objective: The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis between brushing traditional pre-surgical hand antisepsis with antiseptic and pre-surgically with handwashing using the antiseptic povidone-iodine (PVP-I) or chlorhexidine. Methods: To achieve these goals, a documentary and exploratory study of 200 gynecological surgeries and mastology performed in the University Hospital Alvaro Alvim, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ. The data of interest for the study were obtained from the data collection record surgeries surgical center and its records according to established clinical record for the collection of information. The 200 surgeries were divided into two groups being 100 children conducted by teams that used the scrubbing hands (group A) and another 100 surgeries the team just washed his hands with antiseptic (group B) mentioned above. Results: Four cases of postoperative wound infection were observed, two in group A and two in group B. The analysis of the results of the present study shows that the two applied pre-surgical asepsis methods, with and without the use of brushes, presented similar efficiency and effectiveness, since there was no statistically significant difference between the rates of infection of the surgical wound. |
|---|
Atividades financiadas
Não foram encontrados projetos financiados.