Publicação
Normative aspects of the science evaluation: thoughts for the research in History of the Sciences and Health of the House of Oswaldo Cruz
| Resumo: | This paper aims to analyze the normative aspects related to the science evaluation, which is situated the research in History of the Sciences and Health of the House of Oswaldo Cruz (COC) / Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz). Brings reflections on the main models of science evaluation, the peer review and quantitative indicators, and indicates the incorporation of new models, open science and altmetric indicators. Turns out that all models are criticized and there is no consensus on a standard. Describes the evaluation criteria adopted by Fiocruz, COC and the area of History of Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes). Highlights the creation of the Fiocruz`s Observatory on Science, Technology and Innovation and the Open Access Policy as efforts to overcome the limits of traditional models of science evaluation and the area of History of Capes changed the evaluation criteria for periodicals, beginning to use the insertion in databases and bibliometric indicators in the classification. |
|---|---|
| Autores principais: | Silva, Marcus Vinícius Pereira da |
| Outros Autores: | Freitas, Lídia Silva de; Cabral, Jacqueline Ribeiro |
| Assunto: | Health Sciences Technology and Innovation Management Resources for Research Science Evaluation History of the Sciences and Health. Gestión de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación en Salud Recursos para la Investigación Evaluación de las Ciencia Historia de la Ciencia e da la Salud. Gestão de Ciência Tecnologia e Inovação em Saúde Recursos para a Pesquisa Avaliação da Ciência História das Ciências e da Saúde. |
| Ano: | 2017 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Tipo de acesso: | acesso aberto |
| Instituição associada: | IBICT |
| Idioma: | português |
| Origem: | Oasisbr |
| Resumo: | This paper aims to analyze the normative aspects related to the science evaluation, which is situated the research in History of the Sciences and Health of the House of Oswaldo Cruz (COC) / Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz). Brings reflections on the main models of science evaluation, the peer review and quantitative indicators, and indicates the incorporation of new models, open science and altmetric indicators. Turns out that all models are criticized and there is no consensus on a standard. Describes the evaluation criteria adopted by Fiocruz, COC and the area of History of Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes). Highlights the creation of the Fiocruz`s Observatory on Science, Technology and Innovation and the Open Access Policy as efforts to overcome the limits of traditional models of science evaluation and the area of History of Capes changed the evaluation criteria for periodicals, beginning to use the insertion in databases and bibliometric indicators in the classification. |
|---|
Atividades financiadas
Não foram encontrados projetos financiados.