Publicação
Influências do esforço muscular respiratório e da assincronia paciente-ventilador sobre o “stress” e o “strain” pulmonares em modelo mecânico de síndrome da angústia respiratória aguda
| Resumo: | Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is an inflammatory disease characterized by pulmonary edema, stiff lungs and hypoxemia. Patients with ARDS are more susceptible to VILI (ventilator induced lung injury). Under mechanical ventilation, lung stress and strain are the main determinants of VILI and in patients with muscle effort patient-ventilator asynchrony may enhance this phenomenon. Ventilation modes PCV and VCV with auto-flow can minimize patient-ventilator asynchrony, but then can liberate the offer of flow and tidal volume, compromising the protective ventilatory strategy in ARDS. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of muscle effort and patient-ventilator asynchrony on pulmonary stress and strain in a mechanic lung model of acute respiratory distress syndrome. An experimental bench study was performed, using a lung simulator, ASL 5000TM, in which was configured a lung model with restrictive respiratory mechanics with complacency of 25ml/cmH2O and resistance of 10 cmH2O/L/sec. Muscle effort was adjusted in three situations: no muscular effort (Pmus = 0), with inspiratory muscle effort (Pmus = -5 cmH2O) and inspiratory and expiratory effort (Pmus = -5/+5 cmH2O), all with breathe rate (b) of 20 bpm. Five ventilators were connected to the simulator through and endotracheal tube No 8.0 mm and adjusted on VCV, VCV with Auto-flowTM (in the ventilator in which it was available) and PCV modes, all with tidal volume (VT): 420 ml, PEEP: 10 cmH2O and breath rate set in two situations: b = 15 bpm (lower than b of the respiratory muscle effort) and b = 25 bpm (higher than b of the respiratory muscle effort). Variables analyzed were: maximum VT, alveolar pressure at the end of inspiration, effective PEEP, driving pressure, transpulmonary pressure at the end of inspiration and expiration, average transpulmonary pressure, inspiratory peak flow and analysis of mechanic curves. In the studied lung model the b of the ventilator adjusted higher of the b of the patient and not the muscle effort was the main determinant for the development of patient-ventilator asynchrony, causing large variations of the VT and pulmonary pressures, intensifying the lung stress and strain. The ventilatory modes had similar behavior, although VCV Auto-flowTM and PCV have presented slightly higher values of VT and pulmonary pressures. Thus it is concluded that the proper adjustment of the programed breath rate in the assisted/controlled modes can minimize patient-ventilator asynchrony, reducing lung stress and strain. |
|---|---|
| Autores principais: | Sales, Raquel Pinto |
| Assunto: | Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave Respiração Artificial |
| Ano: | 2014 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Tipo de documento: | dissertação de mestrado |
| Tipo de acesso: | acesso aberto |
| Instituição associada: | IBICT |
| Idioma: | português |
| Origem: | Oasisbr |
| Resumo: | Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is an inflammatory disease characterized by pulmonary edema, stiff lungs and hypoxemia. Patients with ARDS are more susceptible to VILI (ventilator induced lung injury). Under mechanical ventilation, lung stress and strain are the main determinants of VILI and in patients with muscle effort patient-ventilator asynchrony may enhance this phenomenon. Ventilation modes PCV and VCV with auto-flow can minimize patient-ventilator asynchrony, but then can liberate the offer of flow and tidal volume, compromising the protective ventilatory strategy in ARDS. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of muscle effort and patient-ventilator asynchrony on pulmonary stress and strain in a mechanic lung model of acute respiratory distress syndrome. An experimental bench study was performed, using a lung simulator, ASL 5000TM, in which was configured a lung model with restrictive respiratory mechanics with complacency of 25ml/cmH2O and resistance of 10 cmH2O/L/sec. Muscle effort was adjusted in three situations: no muscular effort (Pmus = 0), with inspiratory muscle effort (Pmus = -5 cmH2O) and inspiratory and expiratory effort (Pmus = -5/+5 cmH2O), all with breathe rate (b) of 20 bpm. Five ventilators were connected to the simulator through and endotracheal tube No 8.0 mm and adjusted on VCV, VCV with Auto-flowTM (in the ventilator in which it was available) and PCV modes, all with tidal volume (VT): 420 ml, PEEP: 10 cmH2O and breath rate set in two situations: b = 15 bpm (lower than b of the respiratory muscle effort) and b = 25 bpm (higher than b of the respiratory muscle effort). Variables analyzed were: maximum VT, alveolar pressure at the end of inspiration, effective PEEP, driving pressure, transpulmonary pressure at the end of inspiration and expiration, average transpulmonary pressure, inspiratory peak flow and analysis of mechanic curves. In the studied lung model the b of the ventilator adjusted higher of the b of the patient and not the muscle effort was the main determinant for the development of patient-ventilator asynchrony, causing large variations of the VT and pulmonary pressures, intensifying the lung stress and strain. The ventilatory modes had similar behavior, although VCV Auto-flowTM and PCV have presented slightly higher values of VT and pulmonary pressures. Thus it is concluded that the proper adjustment of the programed breath rate in the assisted/controlled modes can minimize patient-ventilator asynchrony, reducing lung stress and strain. |
|---|
Atividades financiadas
Não foram encontrados projetos financiados.