Publicação

No relationships between the within-subjects' variability of pain intensity reports and variability of other bodily sensations reports

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:Purpose: The subjective nature of pain assessment and its large variance negatively affect patient-health care provider communication and reduce the assay sensitivity of pain clinical trials. Given the lack of an objective gold standard measure, identifying the source (true or error) of the within-subject variability of pain reports is a challenge. By assessing the within-subjects variability of pain and taste reports, alongside with interoceptive measures, the current study is aimed to investigate if the ability to reliably report bodily sensations is a cross-modal characteristic. Patients and Methods: This prospective study enrolled healthy volunteers from local universities. After consenting, subjects underwent the Focus Analgesia Selection Task (FAST), to assess within-subjects variability of pain reports in response to experimental noxious stimuli; a taste task, which similarly assesses within-subjects variability of tastes (salty and sweet) intensity reports; and the heartbeat perception task, an interoceptive task aimed to assess how accurate subjects are in monitoring and reporting their own heartbeat. In addition, all subjects completed the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Spearman's correlations were used to assess relations between all measures. Results: Sixty healthy volunteers were recruited. Variability of intensity reports of different modalities were independent of each other (P > 0.05 for all correlations). The only correlation found was within modality, between variability of intensity reports of salt and sweet tastes (Spearman's r = 0.477, P < 0.001). No correlations were found between any of the task results and questionnaire results. Conclusion: Within-subjects variability of pain reports do not relate to variability of reports of other modalities or to interoceptive awareness. Further research is ongoing to investigate the clinical relevance of within-subjects' variability of pain reports.
Autores principais:Agostinho, Mariana
Outros Autores:Canaipa, Rita; Honigman, Liat; Treister, Roi
Assunto:Interoceptive awareness Pain assessment Pain intensity Subjective measures Within-subject variability
Ano:2019
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
_version_ 1877783932077867008
author Agostinho, Mariana
author2 Canaipa, Rita
Honigman, Liat
Treister, Roi
author2_role author
author
author
author_facet Agostinho, Mariana
Canaipa, Rita
Honigman, Liat
Treister, Roi
author_role author
contributor_name_str_mv Veritati
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Agostinho, Mariana\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Canaipa, Rita\",\"Person.identifier.cienciaID\":\"1E19-8EF2-7B9D\",\"Person.identifier.orcid\":\"0000-0003-2437-7825\",\"Person.identifier.scopusAuthorID\":\"56507377000\",\"Person.identifier.scopusAuthorID\":\"56507377000\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Honigman, Liat\",\"Person.identifier.orcid\":\"0000-0002-3338-4675\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Treister, Roi\"}]
datacite.contributors.contributor.contributorName.fl_str_mv Veritati
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Agostinho, Mariana
Canaipa, Rita
Honigman, Liat
Treister, Roi
datacite.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
datacite.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-04-14T10:57:28Z
datacite.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2021-04-14T10:57:28Z
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv Interoceptive awareness
Pain assessment
Pain intensity
Subjective measures
Within-subject variability
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv No relationships between the within-subjects' variability of pain intensity reports and variability of other bodily sensations reports
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Veritati
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Agostinho, Mariana
Canaipa, Rita
Honigman, Liat
Treister, Roi
dc.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-04-14T10:57:28Z
dc.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2021-04-14T10:57:28Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/32566
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.rights.cclincense.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Interoceptive awareness
Pain assessment
Pain intensity
Subjective measures
Within-subject variability
dc.title.fl_str_mv No relationships between the within-subjects' variability of pain intensity reports and variability of other bodily sensations reports
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description Purpose: The subjective nature of pain assessment and its large variance negatively affect patient-health care provider communication and reduce the assay sensitivity of pain clinical trials. Given the lack of an objective gold standard measure, identifying the source (true or error) of the within-subject variability of pain reports is a challenge. By assessing the within-subjects variability of pain and taste reports, alongside with interoceptive measures, the current study is aimed to investigate if the ability to reliably report bodily sensations is a cross-modal characteristic. Patients and Methods: This prospective study enrolled healthy volunteers from local universities. After consenting, subjects underwent the Focus Analgesia Selection Task (FAST), to assess within-subjects variability of pain reports in response to experimental noxious stimuli; a taste task, which similarly assesses within-subjects variability of tastes (salty and sweet) intensity reports; and the heartbeat perception task, an interoceptive task aimed to assess how accurate subjects are in monitoring and reporting their own heartbeat. In addition, all subjects completed the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Spearman's correlations were used to assess relations between all measures. Results: Sixty healthy volunteers were recruited. Variability of intensity reports of different modalities were independent of each other (P > 0.05 for all correlations). The only correlation found was within modality, between variability of intensity reports of salt and sweet tastes (Spearman's r = 0.477, P < 0.001). No correlations were found between any of the task results and questionnaire results. Conclusion: Within-subjects variability of pain reports do not relate to variability of reports of other modalities or to interoceptive awareness. Further research is ongoing to investigate the clinical relevance of within-subjects' variability of pain reports.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
fulltext.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ucp.pt/bitstreams/d3fefbf9-49b9-4986-82e1-808a838d1476/download
id veritati_a9027d094524e118559edace3f63e0f9
identifier.url.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/32566
inst_facet_str urn:organizationAcronym:ucp{{{_:::_}}}Universidade Católica Portuguesa
instacron_str ucp
institution Universidade Católica Portuguesa
instname_str Universidade Católica Portuguesa
language eng
network_acronym_str veritati
network_name_str Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/32566
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:ucp
person_str_mv Agostinho, Mariana
Canaipa, Rita
Canaipa, Rita
https://www.ciencia-id.pt/1E19-8EF2-7B9D
1E19-8EF2-7B9D
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2437-7825
0000-0003-2437-7825
Honigman, Liat
Honigman, Liat
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3338-4675
0000-0002-3338-4675
Treister, Roi
publishDate 2019
repo_facet_str urn:repositoryAcronym:veritati{{{_:::_}}}Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
reponame_str Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:veritati
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:veritati
spelling engpt_PTPurpose: The subjective nature of pain assessment and its large variance negatively affect patient-health care provider communication and reduce the assay sensitivity of pain clinical trials. Given the lack of an objective gold standard measure, identifying the source (true or error) of the within-subject variability of pain reports is a challenge. By assessing the within-subjects variability of pain and taste reports, alongside with interoceptive measures, the current study is aimed to investigate if the ability to reliably report bodily sensations is a cross-modal characteristic. Patients and Methods: This prospective study enrolled healthy volunteers from local universities. After consenting, subjects underwent the Focus Analgesia Selection Task (FAST), to assess within-subjects variability of pain reports in response to experimental noxious stimuli; a taste task, which similarly assesses within-subjects variability of tastes (salty and sweet) intensity reports; and the heartbeat perception task, an interoceptive task aimed to assess how accurate subjects are in monitoring and reporting their own heartbeat. In addition, all subjects completed the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Spearman's correlations were used to assess relations between all measures. Results: Sixty healthy volunteers were recruited. Variability of intensity reports of different modalities were independent of each other (P > 0.05 for all correlations). The only correlation found was within modality, between variability of intensity reports of salt and sweet tastes (Spearman's r = 0.477, P < 0.001). No correlations were found between any of the task results and questionnaire results. Conclusion: Within-subjects variability of pain reports do not relate to variability of reports of other modalities or to interoceptive awareness. Further research is ongoing to investigate the clinical relevance of within-subjects' variability of pain reports.application/pdfpt_PTNo relationships between the within-subjects' variability of pain intensity reports and variability of other bodily sensations reportsAgostinho, MarianaPersonalCanaipa, RitaDSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/2ef2e30b-a5fa-4a9f-a599-d17615736f50DSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/2ef2e30b-a5fa-4a9f-a599-d17615736f50CanaipaRitaCiência IDhttps://www.ciencia-id.pt1E19-8EF2-7B9DORCIDhttp://orcid.org0000-0003-2437-7825Scopus Author IDhttps://www.scopus.com56507377000Scopus Author IDhttps://www.scopus.com56507377000PersonalHonigman, LiatDSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/0cc9f201-9ab4-433e-8478-9fe29b2587d6DSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/0cc9f201-9ab4-433e-8478-9fe29b2587d6HonigmanLiatORCIDhttp://orcid.org0000-0002-3338-4675Treister, RoiHostingInstitutionOrganizationalVeritatie-mailmailto:repositorio@ucp.ptrepositorio@ucp.ptISSNIsPartOf1664-8021DOIIsPartOf10.3389/fnins.2019.007742021-04-14T10:57:28Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00ZHandlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/32566http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2open accessInteroceptive awarenessPain assessmentPain intensitySubjective measuresWithin-subject variability582549 bytesliteraturehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501journal article2019http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2application/pdffulltexthttps://repositorio.ucp.pt/bitstreams/d3fefbf9-49b9-4986-82e1-808a838d1476/downloadFrontiers in Genetics10JUL
spellingShingle No relationships between the within-subjects' variability of pain intensity reports and variability of other bodily sensations reports
Agostinho, Mariana
Interoceptive awareness
Pain assessment
Pain intensity
Subjective measures
Within-subject variability
status SINGLETON
subject.fl_str_mv Interoceptive awareness
Pain assessment
Pain intensity
Subjective measures
Within-subject variability
title No relationships between the within-subjects' variability of pain intensity reports and variability of other bodily sensations reports
title_full No relationships between the within-subjects' variability of pain intensity reports and variability of other bodily sensations reports
title_fullStr No relationships between the within-subjects' variability of pain intensity reports and variability of other bodily sensations reports
title_full_unstemmed No relationships between the within-subjects' variability of pain intensity reports and variability of other bodily sensations reports
title_short No relationships between the within-subjects' variability of pain intensity reports and variability of other bodily sensations reports
title_sort No relationships between the within-subjects' variability of pain intensity reports and variability of other bodily sensations reports
topic Interoceptive awareness
Pain assessment
Pain intensity
Subjective measures
Within-subject variability
topic_facet Interoceptive awareness
Pain assessment
Pain intensity
Subjective measures
Within-subject variability
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/32566
visible 1

Atividades financiadas

Não foram encontrados projetos financiados.