Publicação

Open access, predatory publishing and peer-review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores principais:	Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Assunto:	Publishing Access to Information Peer Review Research Codes of Ethics Cooperative Behavior
Ano:	2014
País:	Portugal
Tipo de documento:	artigo
Tipo de acesso:	acesso aberto
Instituição associada:	Universidade de Lisboa
Idioma:	inglês
Origem:	Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa

Registos relacionados

Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado em: (2021)

Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado em: (2018)

Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado em: (2018)

Collaborative publishing: the difference between 'gratis journals' and 'open access journals'
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado em: (2015)

Scholarly publishing and peer-review in times of crisis: an overview
por: Henriques, Susana Oliveira
Publicado em: (2022)

Predatory publishing
por: Revés, Joana
Publicado em: (2018)

Peer Review: Always on the Good Side?
por: Sousa, Catarina
Publicado em: (2023)

All publishers are predatory - some are bigger than others
por: AMARAL,OLAVO B.
Publicado em: (2018)

The Peer Review Process
por: Donato, Helena
Publicado em: (2021)

The crisis in scientific publishing : a holistic perspective about background issues associated with predatory publishing
por: Hanscheid, Thomas
Publicado em: (2018)

Predatory Publishing: An Industry that Is Threatening Science
por: Revés, Joana
Publicado em: (2018)

Peer Review at Sinapse: Ensuring Quality in Publication
por: Donato, Helena
Publicado em: (2025)

Letter to the Editor: Still Regarding Predatory Publishing
por: Gama Marques, João
Publicado em: (2018)

Open Access Publishing and the Challenges for Scientific Associations
por: Romão, Ana
Publicado em: (2017)

The Crisis in Scientific Publishing: A Holistic Perspective About Background Issues Associated with Predatory Publishing
por: Hanscheid, Thomas
Publicado em: (2018)

Letter to the Editor About the Article “Predatory Publishing: An Industry that Is Threatening”
por: Santiago, Luiz Miguel
Publicado em: (2018)

Improving the quality of peer review: GGA instructions for reviewers
por: Wachholz,Patrick Alexander
Publicado em: (2019)

Electronic publishing and open access to information: the nigerian situation
por: Ikponmwosa, Obaseki Tony
Publicado em: (2013)

Writing scientific papers
por: Pereira,Maurício Gomes
Publicado em: (2007)

Open peer review: an analysis of scientific journals indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals
por: Andrade Maia, Francisca Clotilde de
Publicado em: (2021)

Open Peer Review: practices and definitions
por: Campos, Andréa Fraga Dias
Publicado em: (2022)

Open Access and Article Processing Charges in Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Journals: a Cross-Sectional Analysis
por: Vervoort,Dominique
Publicado em: (2021)

Early career researchers on all aspects of peer review: a deep dive into the data
por: Nicholas, David
Publicado em: (2025)

Publishing within open science challenges
por: Antunes, Maria Da Luz
Publicado em: (2019)

Publishing within Open Science challenges
por: Antunes, Maria da Luz
Publicado em: (2019)

Publishing within Open Science challenges
por: Antunes, Maria Da Luz
Publicado em: (2019)

Decentralising scientific publishing: can the blockchain improve science communication?
por: Coelho, Flávio Codeço
Publicado em: (2020)

Individual integrity and public morality in scientific publishing
por: Della-Sala,Sergio
Publicado em: (2022)

Methodological adequacy of articles published in two open-access Brazilian cardiology periodicals
por: Macedo,Cristiane Rufino
Publicado em: (2010)

Attitudes to open peer review among stakeholders of a scholarly-led journal in Brazil
por: Fontenelle, Leonardo Ferreira
Publicado em: (2020)

Master students’ reactions to peer review
por: Carvalho, Ana Amélia Amorim
Publicado em: (2008)

plaNext – next generation planning: verso una peer-review aperta
por: Caruso, Nadia
Publicado em: (2017)

Letter to the Editor - Predatory Journals: Bad for All But Especially Authors from Low and Middle Income Countries
por: Clark, Jocalyn
Publicado em: (2018)

Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers
por: Costa, António Pedro
Publicado em: (2019)

Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers
por: Costa,António Pedro
Publicado em: (2019)

Advantages and disadvantages of open peer review: consensus and dissent in the literature
por: Pedri, Patricia
Publicado em: (2021)

Behaviors and strategies in clinical leadership in nursing: scoping review
por: Ramos,Olga Moura
Publicado em: (2025)

Análise crítica de um artigo científico
por: Morais, A
Publicado em: (2016)

An analysis of articles on qualitative studies conducted by doctors published in scientific journals in Brazil between 2004 and 2013
por: Taquette,Stella Regina
Publicado em: (2017)

Dynamic Query Plan for Efficient Query Processing in Peer-to-Peer Environments
por: Masud, Mehedi
Publicado em: (2008)

Atividades financiadas

Não foram encontrados projetos financiados.