Publicação

Comparison of young swimmer’s active drag coefficient using three methods to compute trunk transverse surface area.

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:The purpose of this study was to compare the active drag coefficient (CDa) of young swimmers using three different ways of measuring the trunk transverse surface area (TTSA). 23 young swimmers, including 12 boys and 11 girls were analyzed. The velocity perturbation method of Kolmogorov was used to compute CDa. The TTSA was calculated based on three methods: (i) measured by photogrammetric; (ii) estimated by the equation developed by Clarys and; (iii) estimated from the equations developed by Morais et al.. Three procedures were used in the comparison CDa values: (i) T-Student test; (ii) simple linear regression analysis and; (iii) Bland Altman plots. All paired samples showed significant differences (p <0.001) when comparing mean values. However, there were significant correlations (p <0.001) between the paired samples in the simple linear regression analysis, and the in the Bland Altman plots for all conditions studied. At least 80% of the plots were within the ± 1.96 standard deviation of the difference. As a conclusion, the mean values of CDa computed with TTSA estimated with the equations developed by Morais et al. were the ones with lower difference compared with TTSA measured directly. Those should be used by coaches and investigators in order to estimate TTSA for CDa computing.
Autores principais:Morais, Jorge
Outros Autores:Costa, Mário; Moreira, Marc; Barbosa, Tiago
Ano:2012
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Universidade Politécnica da Guarda
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Repositório Científico da Universidade Politécnica da Guarda
_version_ 1880131316899381248
author Morais, Jorge
author2 Costa, Mário
Moreira, Marc
Barbosa, Tiago
author2_role author
author
author
author_facet Morais, Jorge
Costa, Mário
Moreira, Marc
Barbosa, Tiago
author_role author
contributor_name_str_mv Repositório Científico da Universidade Politécnica da Guarda
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Morais, Jorge\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Costa, Mário\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Moreira, Marc\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Barbosa, Tiago\"}]
datacite.contributors.contributor.contributorName.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico da Universidade Politécnica da Guarda
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Morais, Jorge
Costa, Mário
Moreira, Marc
Barbosa, Tiago
datacite.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Comparison of young swimmer’s active drag coefficient using three methods to compute trunk transverse surface area.
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico da Universidade Politécnica da Guarda
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Morais, Jorge
Costa, Mário
Moreira, Marc
Barbosa, Tiago
dc.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10314/3294
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Desafio Singular
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.title.fl_str_mv Comparison of young swimmer’s active drag coefficient using three methods to compute trunk transverse surface area.
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description The purpose of this study was to compare the active drag coefficient (CDa) of young swimmers using three different ways of measuring the trunk transverse surface area (TTSA). 23 young swimmers, including 12 boys and 11 girls were analyzed. The velocity perturbation method of Kolmogorov was used to compute CDa. The TTSA was calculated based on three methods: (i) measured by photogrammetric; (ii) estimated by the equation developed by Clarys and; (iii) estimated from the equations developed by Morais et al.. Three procedures were used in the comparison CDa values: (i) T-Student test; (ii) simple linear regression analysis and; (iii) Bland Altman plots. All paired samples showed significant differences (p <0.001) when comparing mean values. However, there were significant correlations (p <0.001) between the paired samples in the simple linear regression analysis, and the in the Bland Altman plots for all conditions studied. At least 80% of the plots were within the ± 1.96 standard deviation of the difference. As a conclusion, the mean values of CDa computed with TTSA estimated with the equations developed by Morais et al. were the ones with lower difference compared with TTSA measured directly. Those should be used by coaches and investigators in order to estimate TTSA for CDa computing.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id ripg_88e967cf7fdcd55a3768aef523b6ed35
identifier.other.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10314/3294
inst_facet_str urn:organizationAcronym:upg{{{_:::_}}}Universidade Politécnica da Guarda
instacron_str upg
institution Universidade Politécnica da Guarda
instname_str Universidade Politécnica da Guarda
language eng
network_acronym_str ripg
network_name_str Repositório Científico da Universidade Politécnica da Guarda
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ipg.pt:10314/3294
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:upg
person_str_mv Morais, Jorge
Costa, Mário
Moreira, Marc
Barbosa, Tiago
publishDate 2012
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Desafio Singular
repo_facet_str urn:repositoryAcronym:ripg{{{_:::_}}}Repositório Científico da Universidade Politécnica da Guarda
reponame_str Repositório Científico da Universidade Politécnica da Guarda
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:ripg
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:ripg
spelling engDesafio SingularenThe purpose of this study was to compare the active drag coefficient (CDa) of young swimmers using three different ways of measuring the trunk transverse surface area (TTSA). 23 young swimmers, including 12 boys and 11 girls were analyzed. The velocity perturbation method of Kolmogorov was used to compute CDa. The TTSA was calculated based on three methods: (i) measured by photogrammetric; (ii) estimated by the equation developed by Clarys and; (iii) estimated from the equations developed by Morais et al.. Three procedures were used in the comparison CDa values: (i) T-Student test; (ii) simple linear regression analysis and; (iii) Bland Altman plots. All paired samples showed significant differences (p <0.001) when comparing mean values. However, there were significant correlations (p <0.001) between the paired samples in the simple linear regression analysis, and the in the Bland Altman plots for all conditions studied. At least 80% of the plots were within the ± 1.96 standard deviation of the difference. As a conclusion, the mean values of CDa computed with TTSA estimated with the equations developed by Morais et al. were the ones with lower difference compared with TTSA measured directly. Those should be used by coaches and investigators in order to estimate TTSA for CDa computing.application/pdfenComparison of young swimmer’s active drag coefficient using three methods to compute trunk transverse surface area.Morais, JorgeCosta, MárioMoreira, MarcBarbosa, TiagoHostingInstitutionOrganizationalRepositório Científico da Universidade Politécnica da Guardae-mailmailto:no-reply+repositorio@ipg.ptno-reply+repositorio@ipg.pt20122012-01-01T00:00:00ZHANDLEhttps://hdl.handle.net/10314/3294http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2open access820365 bytesliteraturehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2application/pdfhttps://repositorio.ipg.pt/bitstreams/d6134aeb-aec0-4a98-b84b-7544fee69b32/download
spellingShingle Comparison of young swimmer’s active drag coefficient using three methods to compute trunk transverse surface area.
Morais, Jorge
status SINGLETON
title Comparison of young swimmer’s active drag coefficient using three methods to compute trunk transverse surface area.
title_full Comparison of young swimmer’s active drag coefficient using three methods to compute trunk transverse surface area.
title_fullStr Comparison of young swimmer’s active drag coefficient using three methods to compute trunk transverse surface area.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of young swimmer’s active drag coefficient using three methods to compute trunk transverse surface area.
title_short Comparison of young swimmer’s active drag coefficient using three methods to compute trunk transverse surface area.
title_sort Comparison of young swimmer’s active drag coefficient using three methods to compute trunk transverse surface area.
url https://hdl.handle.net/10314/3294
visible 1

Atividades financiadas

Não foram encontrados projetos financiados.