Publicação

Brazilian scientific journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS): a quality analysis

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:This study aims to assess the quality of Brazilian journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS) in order to be published. For this purpose, the main criteria used to assess quality were sought in the available literature, and a selection was made of those considered to be of great relevance. The universe of the research was comprised of journals that were correctly registered under their respective subject heading in the system website by June 2010, a total of 236. The sample's nature is intentional and, according to the established criteria, 78 journals were selected for the study. The quality aspects evaluated were: editorial board, authors, rules for article submission, peer review, age, format, language of publication and the journal impact. The criteria were assessed by indicating the presence/absence of the quality indicator or by attributing a poor/reasonable/good, quality scale, according to the criterion assessed. The results indicate that the criteria established for authors, rules for article submission, and format were positively evaluated. The editorial board was also positively assessed, although 38% of the journals analysed did not present the composition of this group on their websites. The peer review criterion was negatively assessed, since only 17% of the journals correctly inform how the article evaluation process occurs and what criteria are used in the assessment of the submitted articles. Furthermore, it was identified the existence of a moderate positive relation between the H-index of the journals and their ages, and that there is no correlation between the language of article publication and the H-index of the journals.
Autores principais:Sandes-Guimarães, Luisa Veras de
Outros Autores:Costa, Sely Maria de Souza
Assunto:Scientific Electronic Journal Open Access Scientific Literature Open Journal Systems (OJS) Quality of Journals
Ano:2012
País:Brasil
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:unknown
Instituição associada:IBICT
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Oasisbr
_version_ 1871611275799166976
author Sandes-Guimarães, Luisa Veras de
author2 Costa, Sely Maria de Souza
author2_role author
author_facet Sandes-Guimarães, Luisa Veras de
Costa, Sely Maria de Souza
author_role author
country_str BR
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Sandes-Guimarães, Luisa Veras de\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Costa, Sely Maria de Souza\"}]
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Sandes-Guimarães, Luisa Veras de
Costa, Sely Maria de Souza
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv Scientific Electronic Journal
Open Access
Scientific Literature
Open Journal Systems (OJS)
Quality of Journals
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Brazilian scientific journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS): a quality analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sandes-Guimarães, Luisa Veras de
Costa, Sely Maria de Souza
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752012000100005
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv TECSI - FEA - Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; v. 9 n. 1 (2012); 61-88
Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2012); 61-88
Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2012); 61-88
1807-1775
reponame:Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Scientific Electronic Journal
Open Access
Scientific Literature
Open Journal Systems (OJS)
Quality of Journals
dc.title.fl_str_mv Brazilian scientific journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS): a quality analysis
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description This study aims to assess the quality of Brazilian journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS) in order to be published. For this purpose, the main criteria used to assess quality were sought in the available literature, and a selection was made of those considered to be of great relevance. The universe of the research was comprised of journals that were correctly registered under their respective subject heading in the system website by June 2010, a total of 236. The sample's nature is intentional and, according to the established criteria, 78 journals were selected for the study. The quality aspects evaluated were: editorial board, authors, rules for article submission, peer review, age, format, language of publication and the journal impact. The criteria were assessed by indicating the presence/absence of the quality indicator or by attributing a poor/reasonable/good, quality scale, according to the criterion assessed. The results indicate that the criteria established for authors, rules for article submission, and format were positively evaluated. The editorial board was also positively assessed, although 38% of the journals analysed did not present the composition of this group on their websites. The peer review criterion was negatively assessed, since only 17% of the journals correctly inform how the article evaluation process occurs and what criteria are used in the assessment of the submitted articles. Furthermore, it was identified the existence of a moderate positive relation between the H-index of the journals and their ages, and that there is no correlation between the language of article publication and the H-index of the journals.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv unknown
format article
id oasisbr_6b05fd1c54a48a2ca5072c1d79df99cb
identifier.doi.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752012000100005
inst_facet_str urn:organizationAcronym:oasisbr{{{_:::_}}}IBICT
instacron_str OASISBR
institution IBICT
instname_str IBICT
language eng
network_acronym_str oasisbr
network_name_str Oasisbr
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/45588
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:oasisbr
person_str_mv Sandes-Guimarães, Luisa Veras de
Costa, Sely Maria de Souza
publishDate 2012
publisher.none.fl_str_mv TECSI - FEA - Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária
repo_facet_str urn:repositoryAcronym:oasisbr{{{_:::_}}}Oasisbr
reponame_str Oasisbr
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:oasisbr
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:oasisbr
spelling Brazilian scientific journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS): a quality analysisSandes-Guimarães, Luisa Veras deCosta, Sely Maria de SouzaScientific Electronic JournalOpen AccessScientific LiteratureOpen Journal Systems (OJS)Quality of JournalsCopyright (c) 2018 JISTEM - Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online)open accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752012000100005DOIhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jistem/article/view/45588URLHasVersionhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jistem/article/view/45588/49186URLHasVersionhttps://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752012000100005DOI2012-04-01This study aims to assess the quality of Brazilian journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS) in order to be published. For this purpose, the main criteria used to assess quality were sought in the available literature, and a selection was made of those considered to be of great relevance. The universe of the research was comprised of journals that were correctly registered under their respective subject heading in the system website by June 2010, a total of 236. The sample's nature is intentional and, according to the established criteria, 78 journals were selected for the study. The quality aspects evaluated were: editorial board, authors, rules for article submission, peer review, age, format, language of publication and the journal impact. The criteria were assessed by indicating the presence/absence of the quality indicator or by attributing a poor/reasonable/good, quality scale, according to the criterion assessed. The results indicate that the criteria established for authors, rules for article submission, and format were positively evaluated. The editorial board was also positively assessed, although 38% of the journals analysed did not present the composition of this group on their websites. The peer review criterion was negatively assessed, since only 17% of the journals correctly inform how the article evaluation process occurs and what criteria are used in the assessment of the submitted articles. Furthermore, it was identified the existence of a moderate positive relation between the H-index of the journals and their ages, and that there is no correlation between the language of article publication and the H-index of the journals.engapplication/pdfTECSI - FEA - Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e AtuáriaJournal of Information Systems and Technology Management; v. 9 n. 1 (2012); 61-88Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2012); 61-88Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2012); 61-881807-1775reponame:Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPjournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501literatureVoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
spellingShingle Brazilian scientific journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS): a quality analysis
Sandes-Guimarães, Luisa Veras de
Scientific Electronic Journal
Open Access
Scientific Literature
Open Journal Systems (OJS)
Quality of Journals
status SINGLETON
status_str VoR
subject.fl_str_mv Scientific Electronic Journal
Open Access
Scientific Literature
Open Journal Systems (OJS)
Quality of Journals
title Brazilian scientific journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS): a quality analysis
title_full Brazilian scientific journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS): a quality analysis
title_fullStr Brazilian scientific journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS): a quality analysis
title_full_unstemmed Brazilian scientific journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS): a quality analysis
title_short Brazilian scientific journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS): a quality analysis
title_sort Brazilian scientific journals that use the Open Journal Systems (OJS): a quality analysis
topic Scientific Electronic Journal
Open Access
Scientific Literature
Open Journal Systems (OJS)
Quality of Journals
topic_facet Scientific Electronic Journal
Open Access
Scientific Literature
Open Journal Systems (OJS)
Quality of Journals
url https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752012000100005
visible 1

Atividades financiadas

Não foram encontrados projetos financiados.