Publication
Interview as a research theme in the field of communication
| Summary: | This article aims to investigate what has been and what has not been debated about interview in the scientific research in the field of communication on Brazil. Initially, were considered papers presented at the largest congress in this field, since last 10 years. Three main axes were identified: discourse, interaction and memory. Consecutively, we revisited two researches most cited, written by Edgar Morin and Cremilda Medina. We identified important aspects about interview in both and points that were silenced. The comparison with the interview approach in another field, oral history, showed that is necessary to broaden the debate, still in early stages, about issues as: power relations between interviewer and interviewee; benefit sharing; formulating questions and interviews about traumas. The broadening of the debate is justified by the dissonance between established journalistic practices and the new demands of the contemporary communication. |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | Mariano, Agnes Francine de Carvalho |
| Subject: | Interview Memory Oral history Interview Entrevista Memoria Historia oral Entrevista Entrevista memória história oral Entrevista |
| Year: | 2018 |
| Country: | Brazil |
| Document type: | article |
| Access type: | unknown |
| Associated institution: | IBICT |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Origin: | Oasisbr |
| Summary: | This article aims to investigate what has been and what has not been debated about interview in the scientific research in the field of communication on Brazil. Initially, were considered papers presented at the largest congress in this field, since last 10 years. Three main axes were identified: discourse, interaction and memory. Consecutively, we revisited two researches most cited, written by Edgar Morin and Cremilda Medina. We identified important aspects about interview in both and points that were silenced. The comparison with the interview approach in another field, oral history, showed that is necessary to broaden the debate, still in early stages, about issues as: power relations between interviewer and interviewee; benefit sharing; formulating questions and interviews about traumas. The broadening of the debate is justified by the dissonance between established journalistic practices and the new demands of the contemporary communication. |
|---|
Funded activities
No funded projects found.